Questions about the workshop

  • 26/11/2015 at 16:25 #1770

    Dear Mr. Baklayan:

    After the workshop, a number of questions have arisen and I am very grateful if you can help me.

    Virus therapy in 8 steps:

    According to the script specific pathogens are tested and treated with E9. I wrote down E5. E5 would be the appropriate level for mycosis and bacteria?

    Why are specific pathogens – i.e. inter alia, fungi – first treated and later the immune blockades against fungi are added?

    In step 3 and 4, cup I is only filled with T and B lymphocytes and RES. During the workshop we used the tested immune ampules?

    Are nitrosamines treated on their own (according to script) or with immune ampules in the first cup?

    Inner environment:

    I have noted that the tapper in the IM-testing does not stick on I/ antenna/ umbilical electrode but on II or III. Is this correct and why?

    (Your forum post about the new antenna placement does not yet mention that the tapper is now part of the umbilical electrode. This I just learned at the workshop)

    Question on the formaldehyde therapy:

    According to your parasite book formaldehyde from a root canal may gain ground in the bone. In January I have started to treat a patient with quite stubborn formaldehyde loads but have not yet found a strong parasite load. (But instead I found some other things, especially intracellular loads. None of the numerous complaints have improved so far.)

    Today I was able to test formaldehyde on tooth 3.6. It underwent root treatment and 2 years ago it was replaced with an implant. Since then there have been gum problems. (Tooth reference is, inter alia, L4 + L5 – both have a disc prolapse. The trace could therefore be correct.)

    When trying around I could test formaldehyde with an allergy to immune cells. The immune cells have partially tested on Lo. (The last 5E testing revealed gallbladder in Hi.)

    I would therefore first treat the allergy to the immune cells on E8 <- decr. and then the formaldehyde with E5³m128 on the tooth (and possibly on the bone?). -> Can I treat an allergy directly at the immune cells and can you give me some tips from experience as well? (Possible folic acid as described in the book? Vitamin B Komplex he takes, glutathione deficiency has not been tested)

    Thank you very much!

    Margot Spietschka

    26/11/2015 at 16:31 #1772

    Dear Mrs. Spietschka:
    I want to answer your detailed questions directly for the sake of clarity:

    Virus therapy in 8 steps:
    According to the script specific pathogens are tested and treated with E9. I wrote down E5. E5 would be the appropriate level for mycosis and bacteria?

    For the virus therapy we use level 9, wobble 3.
    For mycoses and bacteria level 5, wobble 3.

    Why are specific pathogens – i.e., inter alia, fungi – first treated and later the immune blockades against fungi are added?

    The immune blockades are always treated first.

    In step 3 and 4, cup I is only filled with T and B lymphocytes and RES. During the workshop we used the tested immune ampules?

    This is an alternative solution for those who do not have the test tray digestive tract/ immune system. The ideal would be, of course, to test the mentioned ampules.

    Are nitrosamines treated on their own (according to script) or with immune ampules in the first cup?

    Nitrosamines are tested on their own.

    Inner environment:
    I have noted that the tapper in the IM-testing does not stick on I/ antenna/ umbilical electrode but on II or III. Is this correct and why?

    No, that is wrong. In the first cup you find the organ that must be supported.

    (Your forum post about the new antenna placement does not yet mention that the tapper is now part of the umbilical electrode. This I just learned at the workshop)

    Yes, that’s new.

    Question on the formaldehyde therapy:
    According to your parasite book formaldehyde from a root canal may gain ground in the bone. In January I have started to treat a patient with quite stubborn formaldehyde loads but have not found a strong parasite load. (But instead I found some other things, especially intracellular loads. None of the numerous complaints have improved so far)
    Today I was able to test formaldehyde on tooth 3.6. It underwent root treatment and 2 years ago it was replaced with an implant. Since then there have been gum problems. (Tooth reference is, inter alia, L4 + L5 – both have a herniated disc. The trace could therefore be correct.)

    Yes, it is confirmed.

    When trying around I could test formaldehyde with an allergy to immune cells. The immune cells have partially tested on Lo. (The last 5E testing revealed gallbladder in Hi.)
    I would therefore first treat the allergy to the immune cells on E8 <- decr. and then the formaldehyde with E5³m128 on the tooth (and possibly on the bone?).

    This Is logical.

    -> Can I treat an allergy directly at the immune cells and can you give me some tips from experience as well? (Possible folic acid as described in the book? Vitamin B complex he takes, glutathione deficiency has not been tested)

    Yes, this works well.

The forum ‘Therapist Bulletin Board’ is closed to new topics and replies.