-
Dear Mr. Baklayan:
At the workshop in Marktschellenberg we have discussed the humoral immune response as follows:
Level 10, LOW, INCREASE, 1-23, sweep in the flow direction, treat, then retest each intensification stage and treat dynamically. The same program was also recommended as a „pretreatment“ in mycosis therapy.
However, we also discussed that if we test and treat the immune cell ampules, LOW is an indication of an existing allergy or autoimmune activity.
Why is the humoral immune system then „activated“ in the level therapy with LOW? If LOW actually constitutes an attenuation?
Best regards,
Irene LangDear Mrs. Lang:
Many thanks for the questions.
This contradiction I already encountered. A definitive explanation I do not have for it. I can only imagine that if you treat level 10 in the LOW range, there is a discharge and cleaning that obviously at best should take place „gently“.
When testing the immune system with HIGH and LOW there are clearly defined ampules, e.g. T lymphocytes. This means that it is clearly defined, whether these cells have to be attenuated or supported, which means in the one case autoimmune tendency and in the other immune support.Incidentally, I’ve discovered something new. Level 10 appears to stimulate the humoral defense against bacteria, mycosis and fungi and has a slightly weaker effect on viruses. However, if you go 2 levels higher, i.e. level 24, this level seems very strong to act against viruses.
The procedure is the same, i.e.: level 24, LOW, Increase in steps of 1, from 1 to 23, one-sided wobbling to the right side.Kind regards,
Alan Baklayan
Das Forum ‘Therapist Bulletin Board’ ist für neue Themen und Antworten geschlossen.